Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Yuri Bezmenov - Soviet Defector - Explains the Occupy Wall Street "movement"

Yes, I know, Yuri died in 1993. Just watch the video. I'll see you in 15 minutes.


Back with me? See, now, when you know their tactics, you see right through them. They are transparent, aren't they?

If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle - Sun Tzu (Chapter 3)

So how did "Occupy" begin? It didn't initially call itself "Occupy". When I initially started researching this, there were 38 pages on The Blaze listed under the key word of "Occupy". Now, there are 40. Depending on when you see this blog posting, what you will want to do is start at the end and work your way backward. The very last page doesn't have much of anything on it, but page 39 is where you first start seeing some significant things.

The "Days of Rage" is where it all began. Some of you may remember that. Why is this significant? They weren't originally 'occupiers', they were 'ragers'. That's not a term they ever used, I use it here now to differentiate. They were having 'Days of Rage' to occupy wall street. That is the genesis of their name. But their use of the phrase "Days of Rage" is significant, because America has seen it before. This is exactly what Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground called their riots.

I hope people will go through the archives of The Blaze, page by page. Who is at best in bed with them or supporting them, at worst the actual organizers and the actual head(s) of the snake? As you saw in the video, it's all the usual suspects, but with greater detail. Communists, Anarchists, Van Jones, DSA and the most particularly radical unions, revolutionaries, ACORN, progressives, George Soros, even Islamists and the Nazi Party have endorsed 'Occupy'.

While these details are important(Yes, I know, show me your friends and I'll show you you're future), those aren't what I want to focus in on. The details that stand out more to me are the symbolic things, the things that mean the most to them. The Days of Rage, for example. Or there's this: Donny Deutsch ‘Repulsed’ by the Tea Party, Hopes for a ‘Kent State’ Type Moment so the Occupy Wall Street Movement Can Really Resonate With the American People.

Who among those reading my words knows or remembers the Kent State Massacre? And this is what Occupy needs?!?!?

Well, yes. It is. In their minds. They're revolutionaries. I don't mean the average person who's disenchanted with any number of things and believes what the media sells them about Occupy, I'm talking about the actual leaders who know full well what they're doing. And they constantly tell us about their violent nature in their imagery. Take the November 17th protests for example. The image you see there is not about Tianenmen Square.

How many Occupy _________ posters, shirts, and other memorabilia can you find which use the clenched fist, a very well known piece of communist imagery? I don't mean the stuff built by individuals. I mean "official" stuff. In that link, I see Occupy Atlanta, Occupy Freedom Plaza, Occupy Red Bank, Occupy Boston, Occupy Toledo, Occupy Portland, but the one that really got my attention was Occupy Miami(this is an amateur image, so see this direct source). Occupy Miami states that "This revolution will not be televised".

When I tell you that they know their history, I'm not kidding. This goes back to Gil Scott Heron and his little poem under that very name. Or how about the upcoming Occupy May Day rallies? Yeah, May day is a well known communist holiday, and again you see the fist. But note the line there about "no chores". They are clearly targeting parents. This is where I can bring this right back to the beginning of the blog posting. See the left's war against the family. At about two minutes into the video I linked you to at the top of this post, you see Glenn Beck on, talking with Bill O'Reilly, and he mentions the book "The Coming Insurrection" while trying to warn people that the insurrection is coming. Well, that was some time ago. No longer is the insurrection coming. It's here. It's name is Occupy. Occupy knows of the Days of Rage, of N17, and yes, they know too about the book the Coming Insurrection. Don't believe me?

Occupy Movement Dumps Clenched Fist for New Logo to Represent the 99 Percent How is the new logo described?

calling the chosen design a "very expensive CIRCLE."

These people know their own history. This is no accident. It can't be. A circle? Where have I heard that term before? Oh yeah! In the book "The Coming Insurrection"! That little book does not have "Chapters", it has 'circles'. First circle, second circle, third circle, and on and on. I know, because I have a copy of it. I've read it. You can get a free copy in the above blog link of mine about the war on the family.

So it's as Sun Tzu said after all. Know your enemy and yourself and you need not fear the result of a hundred battles, because you can see them coming 20 miles away and be prepared way before they arrive.


1 comment:

  1. Well, i see this spiritually, as the original “occupy movement” was that of the “occupy the throne of God” initiative by a selfish being, who like many protesters i believe, basically had an animus against the idea of striving lawfully for rewards, (2Tim. 2:5) but sought to “climb up some other way.” (Jn. 10:1) See Isaiah 14:12-14.

    As the devil would have God divest Himself of His rightful power and position (which is not out of selfishness but as that is what is right and best), to “share the wealth” with one who selfishly lusts after such, likewise these occupy souls are at war with the principles of gaining position, and demand those who are worthy of their reward to relinquish it so that the indolent can live as a wealthy man, as they see *everyone* as a victim of the former.

    In the Garden (Gn. 3) the devil sought to instill the same victim-entitlement mentality he evidences himself, working to convince Eve she was victimized due to a solitary restriction, and basically demanded that God “share the wealth,” that of Divine knowledge which they were not fit to handle.

    As in Godless Communism which also relies upon a victim entitlement mentality, the pretext behind this rebellion is that of some abuse, real and or magnified or imagined. The hippie movement reproved materialism to justify their rebellion against Biblical morality, commitment, responsibility, diligence, hard work and other proven principals necessary for good families and society, and penalties for rejecting them.

    And in its place they sought to establish a Woodstock type utopia of music, fornication and drugs (delusion by the latter providing the closest thing to what they seek), having no problem with able-bodied men taking food stamps from the government they habitually protested against. But which being implemented results more in a Haight Asbury experience than any utopia, and of being in dependance upon the traditional model they rebelled against, while it exists.

    The Present Costs of the War against God are manifestly abundant in souls, live and money, with spiritual blindness in part happening to America, electing prevaricating princes who tell them what to hear.

    And thus let us hear the conclusion of the matter on a national scope: "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance." (Psalms 33:12)

    "The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God." (Psalms 9:17)